- Attempt 1 – Original underexposed image
- Attempt 1 – Underexposed shot with shadows lifted and minor adjustments
- Attempt 2 – Original Over exposed sky
- Attempt 2 – Overexposed shot with highlights pulled down
- Attempt 3 – Original Correct Exposure
- Attempt 3 – Original Under Exposed
- Attempt 3 – Over exposed
- Attempt 3 – HDR Processed in Photomatix Natural style
- Attempt 4 – Foreground exposure
- Attempt 4 – Sky Exposure
- Attempt 4 – manual merge
- Attempt 5 – Same images as Attempt 3 different settings and Aperture
- Tisen Hanging on Daddy
I am on a quest to get the exposure I want. The scene is one I enjoy daily, but this particular day there was a stunning cloud display in the background.
The problem is a classic one. A camera cannot correctly handle the same range of light that our eyes can. Especially not when I’m looking at the world through polarized sunglasses. 🙂 It’s an issue that photographers have struggled with since the beginnings of photography. You see a stunning sky and a lovely foreground view. The camera can only properly expose one or the other.
I took shots of the scene with multiple exposures, hoping I could combine them successfully into one image. High Dynamic Range (HDR) photography has been both rejected and embraced by the “serious” photographers of our time. I believe it’s not the combination of exposures that troubles more traditional photographers but the special effects that can make an image hover on a line between a drawing and a photo. I get this impression because many traditionalists extol the value of having a camera that will combine multiple exposures into a single image but have no interest in “HDR” post processing software like Photomatix.
Not that anyone is looking to me for guidance on the subject, but I continue to be on the fence. I don’t care for photos that make you wonder if it’s a photo or a drawing. but I don’t mind an image that looks clearly like one or the other.
I also don’t like spending hours editing a photo I could have captured in the camera in by making better decisions. However, when it comes to the age old problem of limited range of proper exposure when I really want to see the sky and still see the details in the foreground, I feel a little more fond of HDR processing.
For today’s exercise, I made an attempt to get a photo that combined the dramatic sky with enough detail in the foreground to keep it interesting. Unfortunately, I forgot I’d changed my camera setting to JPEG, so I’m afraid I have limited resolution to work with and each edit step diminishes the resolution further. But, I’ve given up on ending up with something I want to print and hang on the wall at this point.
Attempt 1: Underexposed image with the shadows lifted a lot, the highlights pulled down a little, and a few other minor adjustments.
Attempt 2: Overexposed image with the highlights pulled down a lot, the shadows lifted a little, and a few other minor adjustments.
Attempt 3: 3 images 2 stops of light apart combined in Photomatix with no other post processing.
Attempt 4: 2 images 2 stops of light apart combined manually in Photoshop Elements (and looking very weird).
Attempt 5: 3 images 2 stops of light apart combined in Photomatix (with different settings than attempt 3) and then adjusted further in Aperture.
In the end, let’s just say I wish I had a camera that could combine two exposures. 🙂
Related articles
- Blurring Lines (nomadicmainstream.com)